Any lnb test reviews lately?

Beli1910 said:
look back in this thread - I posted pictures of all the Diablo models I found. Single and twin are somewhat equivalent in terms of results. Except for this new single model, which is worse.
Click to expand...
Ok
 
Has someone tested already in 2.40 satellite dish eutelsat 7east these lnb to give us results:

1. Invacom flange 0.3db SNF-031
2. Inverto flange pro 0.2db
3. Chinese flange 0.1db gain 70
4. Inverto new flange quad white the cost 339 euro (maybe a professional techician has tested)
 
stephan94 said:
According to Beli1910's description I think my Diavolo Twin is variant 1?
View attachment 159093
Click to expand...
Your variant here is not 1 but v3. I have been able to distinguish between V1 and V3 by looking at their boxes closely. V1 does not have LTE capability while V3 does. Check my attached photo at post 233 where you will notice I have V1 single and V3 twin. The signal quality almost the same with V1 having a very slight urge. It seem to me hm sat has the V1 twin in stock.
 
happy new year.

I don't see much difference between the two boxes, but if you say I have the V3, why not?lnb.jpg
 
These 3 I have I have put one in 39 east in my wave frontier T90 signal excellent. Still I have not compare other sats I have black inverto ultra in others latest.
 

Attachments

  • IMG20250102111622.jpg
    IMG20250102111622.jpg
    3.1 MB · Views: 74
stephan94 said:
happy new year.

I don't see much difference between the two boxes, but if you say I have the V3, why not?
Click to expand...
This box has LTE inscribed on it while the other that is the single at post number 233 does not. On the WHY NOT question, we were trying to distinguish among the variants of the devil and was only contributing to same.
 
ymttt said:
This box has LTE inscribed on it while the other that is the single at post number 233 does not. On the WHY NOT question, we were trying to distinguish among the variants of the devil and was only contributing to same.
Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • IMG-20250102-WA0033.jpg
    IMG-20250102-WA0033.jpg
    41.7 KB · Views: 79
My suggested guidance to those interested in variant 1 as described by Beli1910 is that V1 does not have LTE inscribed on the box. That is understandable because it is as old as 17 years.
 
I had compared the boxes of the two LNB Twin which are the same, I had not paid attention to the LNB single which does not have LTE.
good afternoon
 
In general, version 1 and version 2 work ok. V3 is a 2024 lnb model and this lnb is not even close to ok. I recommend Diavlo lnb on the following satellites - especially if it is used on t 90 antennas or multifeed. 28E, 19E, 13E0.8w, as it slightly deviates from the rest of the competition.
 
I am waiting for new models of different LNBs to arrive. I have ordered 9 different types of lnb single and twin models, that is, 18 new lnbs are coming for playing and testing. I am already looking forward to the tests and joy. I also hope for some satisfactory result. I am also interested has anyone on the forum tested humax gold editon lnb single or twin. I know that once upon a time this brand had good lnbs. I might order them in the next round of tests
 
Beli1910 said:
I am waiting for new models of different LNBs to arrive. I have ordered 9 different types of lnb single and twin models, that is, 18 new lnbs are coming for playing and testing. I am already looking forward to the tests and joy. I also hope for some satisfactory result. I am also interested has anyone on the forum tested humax gold editon lnb single or twin. I know that once upon a time this brand had good lnbs. I might order them in the next round of tests
Click to expand...
I have it. A very good lnb but megasat diavolo is better.
 

Attachments

  • 20250102_184149.jpg
    20250102_184149.jpg
    677.3 KB · Views: 63
Last edited:
Beli1910 said:
I am waiting for new models of different LNBs to arrive. I have ordered 9 different types of lnb single and twin models, that is, 18 new lnbs are coming for playing and testing. I am already looking forward to the tests and joy. I also hope for some satisfactory result. I am also interested has anyone on the forum tested humax gold editon lnb single or twin. I know that once upon a time this brand had good lnbs. I might order them in the next round of tests
Click to expand...
Which are these lnbs?
 
A little new material for new signal quality tests. Of course, when I have time for it. It is important that the edge is at home.
1000003891.jpg
 
@Beli1910 when you are ready if you could give us a result for wave frontier T90.
It is very interesting because from the lnb you have in picture i do not obtain ... any of them!
 
Regarding equipment and consumables, there is a growing problem in stores with satellite equipment. I personally look at all satshops in Europe and every now and then I order some equipment. Ha ha, I'm probably more stocked than many stores.
 
MEGASAT Diavolo Twin LNB.

Alicante, España......full scan tonight 16.40hrs, 1.8m Marrafa PF...............Receiver:- Uclan-Ustym-4k-Pro-Twin-S2X

Different test today using prime focus dish......done a few years ago using basic Opticum Quad LNB so thought would put the topical Diavolo Twin on the Marrafa 1.8m PF instead of the more usual C120 flange......use not approved by some but like myself others have secured very good results comparing to the Inverto C120 Quad Flange! :oops:

Used 28.2ºe as we are def on the fringe reception of the U.K. beam, late October to early new year is the best time for reception as later hotter months see certain frequencies weaken/disappear.

Whatever, the Diavolo Twin after fine tuning skew etc with the Enigma 2 'Signal Meter' app gave superb results missing nothing the 15 year old Inverto C120 Quad Flange secured.

Later, tried the Diavalo Twin again using the 1.8m PF on 21.6ºe and secured a very low symbol rate:-

11602 H 00171 - DVB-S2/QPSK
No more tests for me with the MEGASAT Diavolo Twin LNB but suffice is to say that I find it superb and a gift at the purchase price. :-applause

a.JPGb.JPGc.jpgd.jpge.jpg
 
Yes, after my tests on several types of antennas and sizes, I prefer Diavlo lnbs. I am actually looking for an lnb to have better results, although I doubt it
 
lovelyperson said:
MEGASAT Diavolo Twin LNB.

Alicante, España......full scan tonight 16.40hrs, 1.8m Marrafa PF...............Receiver:- Uclan-Ustym-4k-Pro-Twin-S2X

Different test today using prime focus dish......done a few years ago using basic Opticum Quad LNB so thought would put the topical Diavolo Twin on the Marrafa 1.8m PF instead of the more usual C120 flange......use not approved by some but like myself others have secured very good results comparing to the Inverto C120 Quad Flange! :oops:

Used 28.2ºe as we are def on the fringe reception of the U.K. beam, late October to early new year is the best time for reception as later hotter months see certain frequencies weaken/disappear.

Whatever, the Diavolo Twin after fine tuning skew etc with the Enigma 2 'Signal Meter' app gave superb results missing nothing the 15 year old Inverto C120 Quad Flange secured.

Later, tried the Diavalo Twin again using the 1.8m PF on 21.6ºe and secured a very low symbol rate:-

11602 H 00171 - DVB-S2/QPSK
No more tests for me with the MEGASAT Diavolo Twin LNB but suffice is to say that I find it superb and a gift at the purchase price. :-applause

View attachment 160150View attachment 160151View attachment 160152View attachment 160153View attachment 160154
Click to expand...
@lovelyperson, I have a bigger prime focus dish and I have decided on trying something out. I have caught the heads off an mti highline twin lnb and a megasat diavolo single lnb and attacked C120 ku flanges to each thus modifying them into prime focus lnbs. I am going to put them up against the megasat diavolo twin, unmodified, to see how they compare. You can see the three lnbs in the pictures attached. You may like to try out something like that.
 
Back
Top