I've conducted more tests with this and other LNBs.
The reference satellite was 7° East, using some of its feeds, with a Gibertini 100 antenna.
First, an important discovery: not all Fracarro 287337 UX-S LTE LNBs are the same. The "
rev.1" version performs well, while the "
rev.3" is absolutely terrible. They can be easily distinguished: the rev.1 has an off-center connector, whereas the rev.3 has it centered.
I found this out the hard way when my first rev.1 unit failed after a few months. When I replaced it, I realized—not without frustration—that the performance of these LNBs varies significantly between revisions.
After multiple purchases, I ended up testing the following models:
- Megasat Diavolo (latest version, hoping for top performance)
- Fracarro 287337 UX-S LTE rev.1
- Fracarro 287337 UX-S LTE rev.3
- Digiquest LNB500A (advertised with a 0.3 dB noise figure)
After a full morning on the roof—don’t ask me why—the best performer on the 7° East feeds turned out to be the
Digiquest LNB500A, roughly on par with the Fracarro rev.1. The Megasat Diavolo followed, with the Fracarro rev.3 coming in last.
I plan to run more tests on different satellites, but I must admit… things are getting pretty confusing!
All tests were conducted on weak signals, of course.
rev. 1 ->
View attachment 161829
rev. 3 ->
View attachment 161830