Robinson74
Member
- My Satellite Setup
- Motorised dish 45E - 30W, Clarke-Tech ET9000
- My Location
- Poland
Unfortunately, everything is already here except the DiSEqC switches.
So I can confirm having 3 HD51 receivers with 2 single tuners each.
As far as I understand, I need uncommitted DiSEqC switches (1.1 or 2.1).
Correct.1. So, these HD51 have SINGLE tuners, not multiple internal tuners as some FBC VU+ tuners have, do I understand that right? So that you need both tuners to watch one channel, and record another channel (on a different satellite)?
Mutant HD51 is not that old. I am pretty sure it handles Unicable II very well. It is, of course, an Enigma2-based receiver running OpenPLi.2. Are these HD51 tuners able to switch between four/multiple satellites under the EN50607 (JESS/ "Unicable II") protocol, did you check that? Because if they can handle only EN50494 (Unicable I), they can switch only between 2 satellites, I would think.
I have never had a chance to check that but again I would assume it can easily combine legacy with JESS.3. Can your HD51 tuners combine legacy diseqc switching, and Unicable/JESS switching, did you check that? Not all receivers can do that. That would be needed for your proposed solution: diseqc switch one path to motor+LNB, and other path to your EN50607 multiswitch.
By the way: as the EN50607 has another switching protocol than diseqc, if I'm informed correctly, I don't see that you'd need diseqc x.1 switches. I would think diseqc x.0 would be good enough.
BTW2. diseqc 1.1 switches were very cheap in china some years ago, especially 8/1 switches. Not bad to use those, as you have spare ports if a port has blown (I have that with some of my 8/1 switches...).
So, can you check in the receivers menu, how many satellite positions it supports for EN50607? (64 positions would be possible.)Mutant HD51 is not that old. I am pretty sure it handles Unicable II very well. It is, of course, an Enigma2-based receiver running OpenPLi.
Combining JESS with legacy is not obvious. I remember in the old days, some receivers could, and others could not. In fact, if I remember correctly from discussions that I read, it was stated that Unicable protocol would 'forbid' the use of diseqc protocol.I have never had a chance to check that but again I would assume it can easily combine legacy with JESS.
I have a 1.0 DiSEqC switch so when I build the installation I will check that. Hopefully within a week.
My understanding is that 1.1 switches pass commands to cascaded (multi)switches while 1.0/2.0 do not but perhaps I am wrong here.
It also must pass current to the rotor, at least 350 mA.
I’ve had several switches burn out when running motor current through them—specifically the 350mA and 500mA models. If you intend to use switches that carry motor current, make sure to use ones designed for this purpose; they can handle up to 1000mA of current through a single port.It also must pass current to the rotor, at least 350 mA.