uk bbc channels normally on 28.2 on intelsat 907 27.5w ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, you in England can receive with small antennas. I am far from England and until now I had a reception of 12.5 db with a 1.5m antenna. the coverage beam will change again.
 
Yes, you in England can receive with small antennas. I am far from England and until now I had a reception of 12.5 db with a 1.5m antenna. the coverage beam will change again.
It should not surprise those of us outside the footprint. Intelsat 901 was from the beginning when it was moved to this position with a weaker signal than 907. It is still an old satellite and moved here as an interim solution.
( I can also think of the wrong option; who knows? they reduced the signal to limit the radiation to a smaller coverage area. :unsure )
 
Yes, you in England can receive with small antennas. I am far from England and until now I had a reception of 12.5 db with a 1.5m antenna. the coverage beam will change again.
I am NOT in England! I live in Stockholm Sweden!
And If I would live in England I would certainly watch BBC via Astra28,2 E :D
 
It should not surprise those of us outside the footprint. Intelsat 901 was from the beginning when it was moved to this position with a weaker signal than 907. It is still an old satellite and moved here as an interim solution.
( I can also think of the wrong option; who knows? they reduced the signal to limit the radiation to a smaller coverage area. :unsure )
Could well be they reduced the signal since it well cover UK with a much lower strength.
53 dbW is not necessary for those the signal is intended for.

 
Hey guys - I901 is an elderly satellite - its quite possible shes having power issues now & Intelsat have had to turn the power down a bit

Or they have just turned the power down as there is no need to run the transponders & amplifiers at 100%. There is plenty of signal in the UK for the Satback sustaining feeder service. All you guys outside the UK are not the intended audience & to put it bluntly are irrelevant!.
 
All this is understandable. I recently noticed a drop in the signal and I asked for information if the same thing happened to other hobbyists in Europe. Personally, it is still interesting for me to catch the signal of someone who, according to satbeam, should not be hunting at my location.
 
Here in the eastern Canarias the signal is well down and showing the strengths and weaknesses of various tuners/dishes where I live. Our communal system has what I think is 1.1 metre dish with old Technomate 5200s and is suffering intermittent lock ups, although the boxes are showing 71%. My own zgemma H7 on an old 1m already dropped from 49% to 41% earlier in the year and has fallen to about 31%, with intermittent complete drop outs. Off the same dish/lnb however my Octagon SF8008 is showing more like 40%. Both use same version of openvix. Earlier in the year when we saw a dramatic drop, it came back up a bit - let’s hope so, but I think a bigger dish is going to be needed for me.
 
Seems to have recovered a bit today - roughly as it was before it dropped. Seems to be like what we saw in mid May where it dropped for a few days then returned. Maybe it is part of the realignment process with the MEV?
 
Or a problem with solar panels
 
The signal has stabilized again and is somewhere at the same level as it was.
Screenshot-20230708-135512.jpg
 
Could well be they reduced the signal since it well cover UK with a much lower strength.
53 dbW is not necessary for those the signal is intended for.

I don't follow these channels - they are uninteresting to me. Personally, I am more interested in signal reception via satellites. Btw, it does not matter at all who the channels are intended for. It is a pleasure for me to have them in the signal reception for better orientation of the fine settings of the clark.
 
I don't follow these channels - they are uninteresting to me. Personally, I am more interested in signal reception via satellites. Btw, it does not matter at all who the channels are intended for. It is a pleasure for me to have them in the signal reception for better orientation of the fine settings of the clark.
Ok now we know your viewpoint.
I think there might be others finding it interesting who the channels are intended for.
I personally get the channels from 28 E.
 
The signal has stabilized again and is somewhere at the same level as it was.
Screenshot-20230708-135512.jpg

i can also confirm that signal level is strong again
 
intelsat 901 end of life is predicted on first quarter 2024 , some members reported issues on C-Band TPs too
 
intelsat 901 end of life is predicted on first quarter 2024 , some members reported issues on C-Band TPs too
Those of us outside the footprint, plus if we use a small antenna, have every reason to be concerned about the drop or disappearance of the signal in our area. We've been through this condition several times since Intelsat 901 replaced 907.
I moved the antenna this evening to 27.5W on the Ku band. I have not noticed an alarming drop in signal at this position in the Ku band.
I'm not sure if the situation is the same in the C-band right now, but in June, I scanned the satellite, and even though the signal dropped/weak, I still managed to receive the RTP programs and noticed some muxes on the spectrum. At this point, I did not try the C-band signal again.
Here is how the Ku-band atm and C-band signal looked like in June this year:
 

Attachments

  • 3700-4200 LR_2023-06-07_15-24-58.png
    3700-4200 LR_2023-06-07_15-24-58.png
    108.6 KB · Views: 11
  • 3844 R,4550,12-RTG1__2023-06-10_12-44-47.png
    3844 R,4550,12-RTG1__2023-06-10_12-44-47.png
    254.3 KB · Views: 14
  • 3932 R,8841,12-RTP_2023-06-10_12-45-50.png
    3932 R,8841,12-RTP_2023-06-10_12-45-50.png
    502.8 KB · Views: 15
  • 27.5W__10950-11700 V_tbs6903x_2023-08-06_21-14-30.png
    27.5W__10950-11700 V_tbs6903x_2023-08-06_21-14-30.png
    110.3 KB · Views: 12
Last edited:
Those of us outside the footprint, plus if we use a small antenna, have every reason to be concerned about the drop or disappearance of the signal in our area. We've been through this condition several times since Intelsat 901 replaced 907.
I moved the antenna this evening to 27.5W on the Ku band. I have not noticed an alarming drop in signal at this position in the Ku band.
I'm not sure if the situation is the same in the C-band right now, but in June, I scanned the satellite, and even though the signal dropped/weak, I still managed to receive the RTP programs and noticed some muxes on the spectrum. At this point, I did not try the C-band signal again.
Here is how the Ku-band atm and C-band signal looked like in June this year:

What stops you getting a larger antenna ?
 
Ig I901 is going EOL in just over 6 months time do we know what (if anything) is likely to be replacing it?

MEV1 should tow I901 back up to graveyard orbit, disconnect & abandon 901 then go onwards to a new rescue mission
 
Thanks for asking, but my situation is more complicated because my passion for reception has caught me in the flat where I live, i.e., in the apartment block. I had to limit myself to a "proper" antenna in the analog days for physical, administrative, and regulatory reasons.
The passion for reception came along without my having proposed it, just because I had to find a solution to install the antenna myself. And where you think it will amuse you, even on the balcony. I was not allowed anywhere else, plus I could not install a bigger antenna, physically speaking, on the balcony except at the risk of collapsing under pressure and weather. Under my balcony, there is a lot of traffic, so I had to consider safety, not so much for the antenna, but to avoid human accidents caused by a possible fall.
I won't go into details; it's too complicated because it depends on my living conditions and biography. Which I don't think anyone is interested in and is a whole other story.
But what I can say is that such a passion, I realized along the way, requires other living conditions, first of all, physical space, where you can be a master without affecting the existence of others. I mean in a house with a yard.
And because I don't have one, it's a bitter irony to discover that this passion doesn't fit the physical conditions in which I live. Perhaps this handicap has made me pay attention to reception details that others with large antennas do not seriously consider, i.e., how the signal behaves on one satellite or another, how it manifests itself over a year, etc.
But to cut a long story short, given the conditions described, I would say that, having learned satellite reception techniques along the way, I feel like a professional working with amateur dishes.
But even if I have such frustrations, I console myself, perhaps a delusion, that my results are close to those of some amateurs with larger antennas. Or, as an editor of a magazine about satellites and reception, where I publish articles and reviews, told me that it is not the size of the antenna that counts but the results.
I hope you'll excuse me for talking too much when I could have got away with a dodge.
Regards.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top